'He certainly wasn't impressed by his first sight of the city, a sprawl of ugly, old-fashioned skyscrapers. blocks of apartments that were like discarded boxes piled up on top of each other, electricity and satellite towers. They stopped at a toll booth where a woman sat in a cramped cubicle, her face hidden behind the white mask that protected her from the traffic fumes. Then they were off again. Next to the road, Alex saw a huge portrait of a man: black hair, glasses, open-neck shirt. It was painted on the entire side of a building, twenty stories high, covering both the brickwork and the windows. "That's our king," the driver explained. They left the highway, driving down a ramp into a dense, chaotic world of shrubs and food stalls, traffic jams and policemen at every intersection, their whistles screaming like dying birds. Alex saw tuk-tuks-- motorized rickshaws-- bicycles and buses that looked as if they had been welded together from a dozen different models. He felt a hollow feeling in his stomach. What was he letting himself into? How was he going to adapt to a country that was, in every last detail, so different from his own? Then the car turned a corner. They had entered the driveway of the Peninsula Hotel and Alex learned something else about Bangkok. It was actually two cities: one very poor and one very rich, living side by side and yet with a great gulf between. His journey had brought him from one to the other. Now he was driving through a beautifully tended tropical garden. As they drew up at the front door, half a dozen Thai men in perfect white uniforms hurried forward to help-- one to take the luggage, one to help Alex out, two more bowing to welcome him, two holding open the hotel doors' (Horowitz 76).
I chose the above passage mainly because of its great imagery. The author uses a lot images and metaphors to paint a very realistic picture of the city of Bangkok for the reader. He uses similes like the "policemen at every intersection, their whistles screaming like dying birds". The author also does a good job of describing the huge differences between the rich and poor parts of the city, saying that both parts lived side by side and yet apart. Another reason why I chose this passage is because it also gives more insight into the character's feelings, and his reactions to the vivid images created in this passage.
Some of my questions about the text include: What has caused Bangkok to be divided like it is?
How much has Western influence changed the face of the city?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Friday, November 14, 2008
Snakehead by Anthony Horowitz 6th post
' "Have you ever heard the term snakehead?" Brooke began. There was silence, so he went on. "Alright, let me start by saying that the snakehead groups are without doubt the biggest and most dangerous criminal organizations in the world. Compared to them, the mafia and the triads are amateurs. They have more influence--and they're doing more damage--even than Al Qaeda, but they're not interested in religion. They have no beliefs. All they want is money. That's the bottom line. They're gangsters, but on a huge scale. Have you ever bought an illegal DVD? the chances are that it was manufactured and distributed by a snakehead. And the profits they'll have made out of it will have gone straight into one of their other concerns, which you may not find so amusing. Maybe its drugs or slaves or body parts. You need a new kidney or a heart? The snakeheads operate the biggest market in illegal organs, and they're not fussy about where they get them or even if the donors are deceased. And then there are weapons. In this century alone, there have been at least fifty wars around the world that have used weapons supplied by the snakeheads... shoulder-launched missiles. AK-47s, that sort of thing. Where do you think the terrorists go if they want a bomb or a gun or something nasty and biological that comes in a test tube? Think of it as an international supermarket, Alex. But everything it sells is bad" ' (Horowitz 62).
The main reason why I chose the above passage is because it talks about the criminal organizations called snakeheads, after which the novel has been named. This passage also uses great imagery to convey to the reader that these snakeheads are bad, and not to be underestimated, mostly by listing all of the illigal activities the snakeheads are involved in, and by mentioning their business affiliations with terrorists. This makes me think about the events of September eleven, 2001, and the terrorist attacks on that day. The above passage is important to the novel because it serves as an introduction to the "beginning of the end" for the entire novel, since the remainder of the book will probably be about Alex infiltrating one of these snakehead organizations.
Some of the questions about the book that have come to my mind include: How does Mr. Brooke know so much about the Snakeheads?
How come I have never heard about Snakehead organizations before if they are supposed to be so powerful?
The main reason why I chose the above passage is because it talks about the criminal organizations called snakeheads, after which the novel has been named. This passage also uses great imagery to convey to the reader that these snakeheads are bad, and not to be underestimated, mostly by listing all of the illigal activities the snakeheads are involved in, and by mentioning their business affiliations with terrorists. This makes me think about the events of September eleven, 2001, and the terrorist attacks on that day. The above passage is important to the novel because it serves as an introduction to the "beginning of the end" for the entire novel, since the remainder of the book will probably be about Alex infiltrating one of these snakehead organizations.
Some of the questions about the book that have come to my mind include: How does Mr. Brooke know so much about the Snakeheads?
How come I have never heard about Snakehead organizations before if they are supposed to be so powerful?
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Snakehead by Anthony Horowitz 5th post
'He took a deep breath, tensing his body, trying to think of the muscles in his legs as coiled springs that could launch him to safety. His right foot was resting on the mine. The left foot was on flat ground. That was the one that would have to do most of the work. Do it! Alex had to force himself, knowing that he might be making the worst mistake of his life, that seconds from now he could be crippled, in agony. He jumped. At the very last moment he changed his mind but continued anyway, launching himself down the slope with all his strength. He thought he felt the mine shudder very slightly as his foot left it. But it hadn't exploded, at least not in the half second that he had left the ground. Automatically, he crossed his arms in front of his face, to protect himself from the fall-- or from the blast. The slope was rushing past him, a dark streak at the corner of his vision. Then he hit the ditch. Water, cold and muddy, splattered into his face. His shoulder hit something hard. Behind him, there was an explosion. The mine. Clumps of earth and torn grass rained down on him. Then nothing. His face was underwater. He pulled his head back, spitting mud. A plume of smoke rose to the sky. The fuse must have given him three seconds before it detonated the mine. He had taken those three seconds and they had saved him' (Horowitz 53).
Even though the events in this passage take place in a matter of seconds, they help draw a picture of Alex, the main character in this book. Just the fact that he is standing on a land mine tells a lot about him. His life is filled is many dangers, this just being one of them. He is also very calm in the face of danger, even when an ordinary person would have lost his nerve. The author also mentions that Alex automatically "crossed his arms in front of his face, to protect himself from the fall," which implies that he has had training of some sort, and is used to act instantly in the face of danger. By using a lot short, simple sentences, the author gives the reader some insight into how the character is taking in all that is happening around him. This makes the passage seem very long and drawn out, as if time were slowing down during his jump.
Some questions I have about the text are: Why did he second guess himself right after he started jumping? Is it unusual for a mine to explode three seconds after the fuse has been activated?
Even though the events in this passage take place in a matter of seconds, they help draw a picture of Alex, the main character in this book. Just the fact that he is standing on a land mine tells a lot about him. His life is filled is many dangers, this just being one of them. He is also very calm in the face of danger, even when an ordinary person would have lost his nerve. The author also mentions that Alex automatically "crossed his arms in front of his face, to protect himself from the fall," which implies that he has had training of some sort, and is used to act instantly in the face of danger. By using a lot short, simple sentences, the author gives the reader some insight into how the character is taking in all that is happening around him. This makes the passage seem very long and drawn out, as if time were slowing down during his jump.
Some questions I have about the text are: Why did he second guess himself right after he started jumping? Is it unusual for a mine to explode three seconds after the fuse has been activated?
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Snakehead by Anthony Horowitz 4th post
'There was a photograph attached to the cover, but as always he had been forced to rely on the official report:
Physical description/attributes
Subject is five feet, seven inches tall, still short for his age, but this adds to his operational value. Weight: 140 pounds. Hair color: fair. Eyes: brown. His physical condition is excellent but may have been compromised by his recent injury (see Scorpia file). The boy is known to be fluent in two languages--French and Spanish--and is also proficient in German. He has practiced karate since the age of eight and has reached first kyu grade (black belt). Weapons training: none. Progress at school has been slow, with negative feedback from many of his teachers. Spring and summer reports from Brookland School are attached. However, it must be remembered that he has been absent from class for much of the past nine months.
Psychological profile
AR was recruited by the Special Operations Division of MI6 in March of this year, age fourteen years and one month. His father was John Rider--alias Hunter--who was killed in action. His mother died at the same time, and he was brought up by his uncle, Ian Rider, also an active agent with MI6. It seems certain that the boy was physically and mentally prepared for intelligence work at the earliest age. Quite apart from the languages and martial arts, Ian Rider equipped him with many skills, including fencing, mountain climbing, white-water rafting, and scuba diving. And yet, despite his obvious aptitude for intelligence work (see below), AR has shown litte enthusiasm for it. Like most teenagers, he is not a patriot and has no interest in politics. MI6 (SO) found it necessary to coerce him to work for them on at least two occasions' (Horowitz 26).
The main reason why I chose this passage is because of its thorough description of the main character, and because the author chose to introduce him into the story via an intelligence report. The author describes the main character in great detail, even down to basic facts such as his height, weight, and eye color. Yet at the same time, the author also indulges into the character's past, as a way of familiarizing the reader with him. That way the reader knows what to expect of him, even though he has not yet entered the story line. I also chose this excerpt from the book because it is the first book I have read in which the main character is treated like a supporting role. So far into the book, he has only been mentioned briefly on the side, which gave me the impression that he was not very important to story. But this passage finally proved that he was indeed the main character of the book.
Some questions I have about the text so far include: When is the main character going to finally show up? How come the Australian intelligence service knows so much about Alex Rider?
Physical description/attributes
Subject is five feet, seven inches tall, still short for his age, but this adds to his operational value. Weight: 140 pounds. Hair color: fair. Eyes: brown. His physical condition is excellent but may have been compromised by his recent injury (see Scorpia file). The boy is known to be fluent in two languages--French and Spanish--and is also proficient in German. He has practiced karate since the age of eight and has reached first kyu grade (black belt). Weapons training: none. Progress at school has been slow, with negative feedback from many of his teachers. Spring and summer reports from Brookland School are attached. However, it must be remembered that he has been absent from class for much of the past nine months.
Psychological profile
AR was recruited by the Special Operations Division of MI6 in March of this year, age fourteen years and one month. His father was John Rider--alias Hunter--who was killed in action. His mother died at the same time, and he was brought up by his uncle, Ian Rider, also an active agent with MI6. It seems certain that the boy was physically and mentally prepared for intelligence work at the earliest age. Quite apart from the languages and martial arts, Ian Rider equipped him with many skills, including fencing, mountain climbing, white-water rafting, and scuba diving. And yet, despite his obvious aptitude for intelligence work (see below), AR has shown litte enthusiasm for it. Like most teenagers, he is not a patriot and has no interest in politics. MI6 (SO) found it necessary to coerce him to work for them on at least two occasions' (Horowitz 26).
The main reason why I chose this passage is because of its thorough description of the main character, and because the author chose to introduce him into the story via an intelligence report. The author describes the main character in great detail, even down to basic facts such as his height, weight, and eye color. Yet at the same time, the author also indulges into the character's past, as a way of familiarizing the reader with him. That way the reader knows what to expect of him, even though he has not yet entered the story line. I also chose this excerpt from the book because it is the first book I have read in which the main character is treated like a supporting role. So far into the book, he has only been mentioned briefly on the side, which gave me the impression that he was not very important to story. But this passage finally proved that he was indeed the main character of the book.
Some questions I have about the text so far include: When is the main character going to finally show up? How come the Australian intelligence service knows so much about Alex Rider?
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Snakehead by Anthony Horowitz 3rd post
'The man's name was Ethan Brooke, and he was the chief executive of the Covert Action Division of ASIS-- the Australian Secret Intelligence Service. His department was inevitably known as CAD, but only by the people who worked in it. Very few other people even knew it existed. Brooke was a large man, in his mid-fifties, with sand-colored hair and ruddy, weather-beaten cheeks that suggested years spend outdoors. He had indeed been a soldier, a lieutenant colonel with the commandos, until a land mine in East Timor had sent him first into the hospital for three months and then into a new career in intelligence. He wore Armani sunglasses, tinted silver, rather than the traditional black glasses of a blind man, and his clothes were casual: jeans, a jacket, and an open-neck shirt. A senior minister in the Australian defense department had once complained about the way he dressed. That same minister was now carrying luggage in a three-star Sydney hotel' (Horowitz 24).
This excerpt from the book includes a lot of imagery, which is the main reason why I chose to include it. The author takes great care describing this individual, especially his back ground and his clothing. What the author doesn't mention in great detail, however, is the fact that Mr. Brooke is blind. Something that would ordinarily hamper him in his position as the head of a secret service department is only mentioned on the side by the author, who seems to think that the fact that Mr. Brooke is wearing silver sun glasses instead of black ones more important in the description of this character. This suggests that this character is not very concerned about his impediment. The last two sentences of the passage also tell a great deal about this character: For one, it tells the reader that Mr. Brooke is a very important person in the Australian government, capable of getting a senior minister "transfered" to a new post. Secondly, the excerpt also suggests that this character is easily angered, and will retaliate as harshly as possible should someone give him offense.
Some questions I have about my reading include: How does Mr. Brooke fit into the rest of the story?
Why hasn't the main character been introduced into the story yet, but only mentioned on the side?
This excerpt from the book includes a lot of imagery, which is the main reason why I chose to include it. The author takes great care describing this individual, especially his back ground and his clothing. What the author doesn't mention in great detail, however, is the fact that Mr. Brooke is blind. Something that would ordinarily hamper him in his position as the head of a secret service department is only mentioned on the side by the author, who seems to think that the fact that Mr. Brooke is wearing silver sun glasses instead of black ones more important in the description of this character. This suggests that this character is not very concerned about his impediment. The last two sentences of the passage also tell a great deal about this character: For one, it tells the reader that Mr. Brooke is a very important person in the Australian government, capable of getting a senior minister "transfered" to a new post. Secondly, the excerpt also suggests that this character is easily angered, and will retaliate as harshly as possible should someone give him offense.
Some questions I have about my reading include: How does Mr. Brooke fit into the rest of the story?
Why hasn't the main character been introduced into the story yet, but only mentioned on the side?
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Snakehead by Anthony Horowitz 2nd Post
'But that was no longer the only purpose of the building in Sloane Street. It had also become the London headquarters of the international crime organization that went by the name of Scorpia. The name stood for "sabotage, corruption, intelligence, and assassination," which were its four main activities. The organization had been formed some thirty before in Paris, its members being spies from different intelligence networks around the world who had decided to go into business for themselves. There had been twelve of them at first. Then one had died of illness and two had been killed in the field. The other nine had congratulated themselves on surviving so long with so few casualties. But quite recently, things had taken a turn for the worse. The oldest member of the organization had made the foolish and inexplicable decision to retire, which had, of course, led to his being murdered immediately. Soon afterward, his successor, a woman named Julia Rothman, had also been killed. That had been at the end of an operation-- Invisible Sword-- that had gone catastrophically wrong. In many ways this was the lowest point in Scorpia's history, and there were many who thought that the organization would never recover'(Horowitz 9).
One of the reasons why I chose the passage is because it answers my previous question of the funeral home described earlier fits into the rest of the story. Another reason why I chose this passage is because it gives the reader a lot of insight into the organization known as Scorpia, which gives me the impression that it is going to play a major role throughout the story. The passage also makes me wonder why the author chose to describe the failures of Scorpia in great detail, while not even mentioning some of its other achievements. The story also makes me wonder why the author seems to linger on the fact that the organization is in bad shape.
Some questions I have about the text are: What exactly happened during operation Invisible Sword?
Why did they murder one of their own when he retired?
What makes Scorpia different from other terrorist organizations?
One of the reasons why I chose the passage is because it answers my previous question of the funeral home described earlier fits into the rest of the story. Another reason why I chose this passage is because it gives the reader a lot of insight into the organization known as Scorpia, which gives me the impression that it is going to play a major role throughout the story. The passage also makes me wonder why the author chose to describe the failures of Scorpia in great detail, while not even mentioning some of its other achievements. The story also makes me wonder why the author seems to linger on the fact that the organization is in bad shape.
Some questions I have about the text are: What exactly happened during operation Invisible Sword?
Why did they murder one of their own when he retired?
What makes Scorpia different from other terrorist organizations?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)